Is it TATA or FIAT?? Take for instance the case of TATA -50% of the salaries is now paid by FIAT,I dont see any Increase in the number of staff either at A.S.S or at the sales point.So,it's the same staff whose 50% of the salary is taken care off by FIAT -50% of the rental paid by FIAT.I dont see any increased space either at sales or service centre,hence it's the same space whose 50% of the rental is taken care off by FIAT -Only 50% of the investment at the Ranjangoan plant by TATA.The plant manufactures 10 times of TATA cars as it does FIAT cars,still the investment was only 50 %,it's not TATA's fault though -The know how of MJD and SAFFIRE engines from FIAT,but still the Vista and Manza does not sell even one third of the earlier number of Indicas and indigos,not a fault of FIAT though. -Access to European and South American markets for NANO and ARIA,via FIAT So,what has FIAT gained in the JV??,just selling 2000 units a month??,it's not TATA's fault though and neither did FIAT have another option.